Matter of Braiter v. Addie Co.
This text of 26 N.E.2d 277 (Matter of Braiter v. Addie Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the absence of proof that an employment certificate, vacation work permit or a certificate of age was on file in the place of claimant’s employment (Labor Law [Cons. Laws, ch. 31], §§ 131, 132), it is no defense to a claim for double compensation under section 14-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 67), by a claimant employed in violation of section 131 of the Labor Law, that the employer was not negligent in determining the age of the claimant at the time of employment. (Matter of Davidowicz v. Klipstein, 272 N. Y. 543; Matter of Kociolowicz v. Tonawanda Corrugated Box Co., 252 App. Div. 716; leave to appeal denied, 276 N. Y. 689.)
The order should be affirmed, with costs.
Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran Finch, Rippey, Sears, Lewis and Conway, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 N.E.2d 277, 282 N.Y. 326, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-braiter-v-addie-co-ny-1940.