Matter of Braiter v. Addie Co.

26 N.E.2d 277, 282 N.Y. 326, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1004
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 5, 1940·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the absence of proof that an employment certificate, vacation work permit or a certificate of age was on file in the place of claimant’s employment (Labor Law [Cons. Laws, ch. 31], §§ 131, 132), it is no defense to a claim for double compensation under section 14-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 67), by a claimant employed in violation of section 131 of the Labor Law, that the employer was not negligent in determining the age of the claimant at the time of employment. (Matter of Davidowicz v. Klipstein, 272 N. Y. 543; Matter of Kociolowicz v. Tonawanda Corrugated Box Co., 252 App. Div. 716; leave to appeal denied, 276 N. Y. 689.)

The order should be affirmed, with costs.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran Finch, Rippey, Sears, Lewis and Conway, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Braiter v. Addie Co., 26 N.E.2d 277, 282 N.Y. 326, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1004 (N.Y. 1940).

26 N.E.2d 277 (Matter of Braiter v. Addie Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Halfacre v. Paragon Bridge & Steel Co.
118 N.W.2d 455 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1962)
Ashe v. Barnes
121 S.E.2d 549 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)
Willis v. Storey
105 So. 2d 128 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
Claim of Carney v. Williams Press Inc.
280 A.D. 634 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
John A. Johnson & Sons, Inc. v. State
279 A.D. 294 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
Claim of Sackolwitz v. Charles Hamburg & Co.
67 N.E.2d 152 (New York Court of Appeals, 1946)