Matter of Boyle v. Johns
This text of 159 N.Y.S.3d 684 (Matter of Boyle v. Johns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Matter of Boyle v Johns |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 01020 |
| Decided on February 16, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on February 16, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
SHERI S. ROMAN
JOSEPH A. ZAYAS, JJ.
2021-03285
(Docket No. O-13343-20)
v
Michael P. Johns, appellant.
Thomas J. Butler, Melville, NY, for appellant.
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Michael P. Johns appeals from an order of protection of the Family Court, Suffolk County (James F. Quinn, J.), dated May 3, 2021. The order of protection, after a hearing, and upon a finding, in effect, that Michael P. Johns committed the family offense of harassment in the second degree, directed him, inter alia, to refrain from harassing the petitioner until and including May 3, 2022. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.
ORDERED that the order of protection is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738). Upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Tunkel v Toonkel, 197 AD3d 473; Matter of Jade Yun Hon v Tin Yat Chin, 148 AD3d 810).
BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN and ZAYAS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
159 N.Y.S.3d 684, 202 A.D.3d 954, 2022 NY Slip Op 01020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-boyle-v-johns-nyappdiv-2022.