Matter of Boyd v. Westchester County Dept. of Social Servs.

2017 NY Slip Op 3171, 149 A.D.3d 1069, 50 N.Y.S.3d 886
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 26, 2017
Docket2016-03504
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 3171 (Matter of Boyd v. Westchester County Dept. of Social Servs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Boyd v. Westchester County Dept. of Social Servs., 2017 NY Slip Op 3171, 149 A.D.3d 1069, 50 N.Y.S.3d 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Appeal by the maternal uncle from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Maria-Alana Reciñe, Ct. Atty. Ref.), entered March 15, 2016. The order dismissed, without a hearing, his petition for custody or visitation with the subject child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In an order entered October 28, 2015, the Family Court (Kathie E. Davidson, J.) terminated the mother’s parental rights pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b and freed the subject child for adoption. On or about December 3, 2015, the child’s maternal uncle (hereinafter the appellant) commenced this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, seeking custody or visitation with the child. The court dismissed the petition without a hearing.

The Family Court properly dismissed the appellant’s petition for custody without a hearing, as the appellant’s recourse was to seek adoption, and not mere custody, of the subject child (see Matter of McHarris v Administration for Children’s Servs., 53 AD3d 660, 660 [2008]; Matter of Snypes v Administration for Children’s Servs., 308 AD2d 593, 593 [2003]; Matter of Patience B. v Administration for Children’s Servs., 306 AD2d 473, 473 [2003]; Social Services Law § 384-b [11]). Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the court also properly dismissed his request for visitation without a hearing (see Matter of McHarris v Administration for Children’s Servs., 53 AD3d at 660; Matter of Katrina E., 223 AD2d 363, 363 [1996]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Rivera, J.R, Austin, Miller and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Graesser v. Erie County Children's Servs.
2025 NY Slip Op 00738 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Matter of Amber W. v. Erie County Children's Servs.
2020 NY Slip Op 4068 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Dajah S. v. New York City Admin. for Children's Servs.
2019 NY Slip Op 2824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 3171, 149 A.D.3d 1069, 50 N.Y.S.3d 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-boyd-v-westchester-county-dept-of-social-servs-nyappdiv-2017.