Matter of Boulac

916 N.E.2d 906, 2009 Ind. LEXIS 1478, 2009 WL 4110365
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 24, 2009
Docket71S00-0701-DI-45
StatusPublished

This text of 916 N.E.2d 906 (Matter of Boulac) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Boulac, 916 N.E.2d 906, 2009 Ind. LEXIS 1478, 2009 WL 4110365 (Ind. 2009).

Opinion

PUBLISHED ORDER REVOKING PROBATION AND IMPOSING SUSPENSION

On December 7, 2007, this Court entered an order approving a conditional agreement under which Respondent was suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, all stayed subject to completion of at least two years of probation with monitoring by the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program. The agreement provides that if probation is revoked, Respondent may be required to serve actively his suspension without automatic reinstatement.

On October 21, 2009, the Commission filed a verified motion to revoke Respondent's probation, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23(17.2), asserting Respondent violated the conditions of probation. Respondent filed no response to the Commission's motion.

Being duly advised, the Court GRANTS the motion, revokes Respondent's probation, and reinstates Respondent's suspension from the practice of law in this state. Respondent shall be suspended for a period of not less than six months, without automatic reinstatement to the practice of law, beginning January 5, 2010. Respondent shall not undertake any new legal matters between service of this order and the effective date of the suspension, and Respondent shall fulfill all the duties of a suspended attorney under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(26). At the conclusion of the minimum period of suspension, Respondent may petition this Court for reinstatement to the practice of law in this state, provided Respondent pays the costs of this proceeding, fulfills the duties of a suspended attorney, and satisfies the requirements for reinstate ment of Admission and Discipline Rule 23(4). The costs of this proceeding are assessed against Respondent.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McSwane v. Bloomington Hospital & Healthcare System
916 N.E.2d 906 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
916 N.E.2d 906, 2009 Ind. LEXIS 1478, 2009 WL 4110365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-boulac-ind-2009.