Matter of Bollard v. Engel

17 N.E.2d 130, 278 N.Y. 463, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1327
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 18, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by33 cases

This text of 17 N.E.2d 130 (Matter of Bollard v. Engel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Bollard v. Engel, 17 N.E.2d 130, 278 N.Y. 463, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1327 (N.Y. 1938).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think the evidence warranted tfie finding that the employment was not interrupted while the deceased was returning from supper on the occasion in question, (Cf. Matter of Johnson v. Smith, 263 N. Y. 10; Matter of Goldman v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., 276 N. Y. 582.) The employer’s first report of injury was not without probative force merely because it was not made upon personal knowledge (Gangi v. Fradus, 227 N. Y. 452, 456, 457).

The order should be affirmed, with costs.

Crane, Ch, J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubrs, Loeghran, Finch and Rjkpey, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Connor v. Serge Elevator Co.
85 A.D.2d 515 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Claim of Smith v. United States Trucking Corp.
66 A.D.2d 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Halstead v. Johnson's Texaco
264 N.W.2d 757 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1978)
Middleton v. Coxsackie Correctional Facility
341 N.E.2d 527 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Hornyak v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
305 A.2d 65 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1973)
Hornyak v. the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
305 A.2d 65 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1973)
Claim of Guggenheim v. C. Hedke & Co.
32 A.D.2d 1017 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)
Claim of Watson v. American Can Co.
23 A.D.2d 423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Claims of Markowitz v. Mack Markowitz, Inc.
22 A.D.2d 1001 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Claim of Relkin v. National Transportation Co.
18 A.D.2d 137 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
Claim of Purcell v. Hearn's Department Store
17 A.D.2d 886 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Claim of Guido v. Terra-Rube Construction Corp.
7 A.D.2d 554 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Claim of Hoffman v. Grain Handling Co.
7 A.D.2d 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Kunze v. Jones
6 A.D.2d 888 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Claim of Smith v. Venezian Lamp Co.
5 A.D.2d 12 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Claim of Bodensky v. Royaltone, Inc.
5 A.D.2d 733 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Claim of Caporale v. State Department of Taxation & Finance
2 A.D.2d 91 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Brooks v. Cal-Metal Pipe Corp. of Louisiana
81 So. 2d 462 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1955)
Claim of Doca v. Federal Stevedoring Co.
123 N.E.2d 632 (New York Court of Appeals, 1954)
Claim of Jamison v. New York State Temporary Commission on Agriculture
283 A.D. 903 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 N.E.2d 130, 278 N.Y. 463, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-bollard-v-engel-ny-1938.