Home/New York Court of Appeals/MATTER OF BOCCIA v. City of New York

MATTER OF BOCCIA v. City of New York

221 N.E.2d 917, 18 N.Y.2d 804
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 25, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 221 N.E.2d 917 (MATTER OF BOCCIA v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF BOCCIA v. City of New York, 221 N.E.2d 917, 18 N.Y.2d 804 (N.Y. 1966).

Opinion

18 N.Y.2d 804 (1966)

In the Matter of the Claim of Josephine Boccia, Respondent,
v.
City of New York, Appellant. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued September 20, 1966.
Decided October 25, 1966.

J. Lee Rankin, Corporation Counsel (Seymour B. Quel and Benjamin Offner of counsel), for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Henriette Frieder, Ruth Kessler Toch and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

No appearance for claimant-respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING.

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen's Compensation Board; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wood v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
123 Misc. 2d 812 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)
Claim of Lopez v. New York City Housing Authority
71 A.D.2d 750 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 N.E.2d 917, 18 N.Y.2d 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-boccia-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1966.