Matter of Blitz
96 N.E.2d 889, 302 N.Y. 573
This text of 96 N.E.2d 889 (Matter of Blitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Matter of Blitz, 96 N.E.2d 889, 302 N.Y. 573 (N.Y. 1951).
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of Beatrice Blitz, Appellant. Edward Corsi, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
John T. De Graff, John E. Holt-Harris, Jr., and John J. Kelly, Jr., for appellant.
Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (Francis R. Curran and Wendell P. Brown of counsel), for respondent.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Badman v. Falk
4 A.D.2d 149 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
96 N.E.2d 889, 302 N.Y. 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-blitz-ny-1951.