Matter of Bleich v. O'Dwyer
This text of 75 N.E.2d 753 (Matter of Bleich v. O'Dwyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Loughban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye and Fuld, JJ.; Thacheb, J., dissents in the following memorandum: I am constrained to dissent. During the period in question all salaries and expenses of the Transit Commission except the salaries of its commissioners, secretary and counsel were subjected to the budget-making powers and procedure of the city, and were required to be audited and to be paid in the same manner as are the expenses of an agency of the city, as prescribed in the charter thereof (L. 1940, ch. 246). The earlier enactments (L. 1937, ch. 859 and L. 1939, ch. 955) could not impair the powers subsequently granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 N.E.2d 753, 297 N.Y. 652, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-bleich-v-odwyer-ny-1947.