Matter of Black v. O'Brien
190 N.E. 489, 264 N.Y. 272, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1425
Opinion
Even if we were to assume that part of the petitioner’s salary as defined by the Constitution *274 has been withheld, the court in the exercise of its discretion might deny the remedy of mandamus.
The order should be affirmed, with costs.
Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ., concur; Kellogg, J., not sitting.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Black v. O'Brien, 190 N.E. 489, 264 N.Y. 272, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1425 (N.Y. 1934).
190 N.E. 489 (Matter of Black v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rockwell v. Morris
12 A.D.2d 272 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
MacKechnie v. Board of Education
11 Misc. 2d 926 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
609 Holding Corp. v. Burke
202 Misc. 709 (New York Supreme Court, 1952)
Burns v. Wiltse
102 N.E.2d 569 (New York Court of Appeals, 1951)
Toscano v. McGoldrick
89 N.E.2d 873 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)
Matter of Benvenga v. La Guardia
63 N.E.2d 88 (New York Court of Appeals, 1945)
Kane v. Walsh
181 Misc. 513 (New York Supreme Court, 1944)
Wolf v. Valentine
178 Misc. 308 (New York Supreme Court, 1942)
Rosenthal v. McGoldrick
167 Misc. 673 (New York Supreme Court, 1938)
Gold v. Ingersoll
167 Misc. 805 (New York Supreme Court, 1938)
Public Service Commission v. New York Central Railroad
249 A.D. 869 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Hall v. Boards of Inspectors of Election & Ballot Clerks
249 A.D. 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Haggerty v. City of New York
196 N.E. 45 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)
Ennis v. Harnett
243 A.D. 516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
Haggerty v. City of New York
153 Misc. 841 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1934)