Matter of Bhoorasingh v. Kortright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Bhoorasingh v. Kortright

137 A.D.3d 1021, 26 N.Y.S.3d 714

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 2016

Docket2014-00790

StatusPublished

This text of 137 A.D.3d 1021 (Matter of Bhoorasingh v. Kortright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Bhoorasingh v. Kortright, 137 A.D.3d 1021, 26 N.Y.S.3d 714 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an *1022 order of the Family Court, Kings County (Michael L. Katz, J.), dated January 15, 2014. The order, after a hearing, insofar as appealed from, denied the mother’s petition to modify a prior order of custody and visitation of that court (Lisa Ottley, J.), dated December 14, 2010, so as to suspend the father’s visitation rights.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from was, in effect, superseded by a subsequent order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated January 16, 2015, which is the subject of a companion appeal decided herewith (see Matter of Kortright v Bhoorasingh, 137 AD3d 1037 [2016] [decided herewith]). In light of our determination of that appeal, the instant appeal has been rendered academic.

Dillon, J.P., Chambers, Dickerson and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an *1022 order of the Family Court, Kings County (Michael L. Katz, J.), dated January 15, 2014. The order, after a hearing, insofar as appealed from, denied the mother’s petition to modify a prior order of custody and visitation of that court (Lisa Ottley, J.), dated December 14, 2010, so as to suspend the father’s visitation rights.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from was, in effect, superseded by a subsequent order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated January 16, 2015, which is the subject of a companion appeal decided herewith (see Matter of Kortright v Bhoorasingh, 137 AD3d 1037 [2016] [decided herewith]). In light of our determination of that appeal, the instant appeal has been rendered academic.

Dillon, J.P., Chambers, Dickerson and Barros, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 A.D.3d 1021, 26 N.Y.S.3d 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-bhoorasingh-v-kortright-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack