Matter of Bergman v. Mergenthaler Linotype Co.
This text of 61 N.E.2d 513 (Matter of Bergman v. Mergenthaler Linotype Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Industrial Board having denied an award for death benefits, the Appellate Division reversed this decision and remitted the matter to the Board for further consideration. The Board thereafter, acting upon a resolution declaring its opinion that the intent of the Appellate Division was “ that the case be referred back to the Industrial Board for the purpose of making an award ”, granted an award solely upon the assumed direction of the Appellate Division, without any reconsideration of the issues previously determined in favor of the Special Fund for Reopened Cases.
Under these circumstances, we are constrained to reverse the decision of the Appellate Division affirming the award and to remit the matter to the Board for a determination of the issues. (Matter of Volinsky v. Reliable Waste & Rag Co., 291 N. Y. 224; Matter of Daus v. Gunderman & Sons, Inc., 283 N. Y. 459.)
The order of the Appellate Division and the award of the State Industrial Board should be reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division against the State Industrial Board, and the matter remitted to the State Industrial Board for determination of the issues.
Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher and Dye, JJ., concur.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 N.E.2d 513, 294 N.Y. 204, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-bergman-v-mergenthaler-linotype-co-ny-1945.