Matter of Bd. of Educ. of the Roosevelt Union Free Sch. Dist. v. Roosevelt Teachers Ass'n

New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Bd. of Educ. of the Roosevelt Union Free Sch. Dist. v. Roosevelt Teachers Ass'n

390 N.E.2d 1176, 47 N.Y.2d 748, 417 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2018, 101 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2349

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 26, 1979

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 390 N.E.2d 1176 (Matter of Bd. of Educ. of the Roosevelt Union Free Sch. Dist. v. Roosevelt Teachers Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Bd. of Educ. of the Roosevelt Union Free Sch. Dist. v. Roosevelt Teachers Ass'n, 390 N.E.2d 1176, 47 N.Y.2d 748, 417 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2018, 101 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2349 (N.Y. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the judgment of the Supreme Court denying the application to stay arbitration reinstated. The board’s failure to advance a Serious argument under the Taylor Law (Civil Service Law, art 14) and the grant to the arbitrator of the "authority to decide whether the provisions of this Agreement have been complied with” mandate the conclusion that the arbitrator had jurisdiction to resolve the union’s claim that the so-called "per diem” teachers were "substitute teachers” within the terms of the agreement (see Matter of Acting Supt. of Schools of Liverpool Cent. School Dist. [United Liverpool Faculty Assn.], 42 NY2d 509, 513; Matter of South Colonie Cent. School Dist. v Longo, 43 NY2d 136; see, also, Board of Educ. v New Paltz United Teachers, 44 NY2d 890).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur.

Order reversed, with costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court, Nassau County, reinstated in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the judgment of the Supreme Court denying the application to stay arbitration reinstated. The board’s failure to advance a Serious argument under the Taylor Law (Civil Service Law, art 14) and the grant to the arbitrator of the "authority to decide whether the provisions of this Agreement have been complied with” mandate the conclusion that the arbitrator had jurisdiction to resolve the union’s claim that the so-called "per diem” teachers were "substitute teachers” within the terms of the agreement (see Matter of Acting Supt. of Schools of Liverpool Cent. School Dist. [United Liverpool Faculty Assn.], 42 NY2d 509, 513; Matter of South Colonie Cent. School Dist. v Longo, 43 NY2d 136; see, also, Board of Educ. v New Paltz United Teachers, 44 NY2d 890).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur.

Order reversed, with costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court, Nassau County, reinstated in a memorandum.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

390 N.E.2d 1176, 47 N.Y.2d 748, 417 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2018, 101 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-bd-of-educ-of-the-roosevelt-union-free-sch-dist-v-roosevelt-ny-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack