MATTER OF BALDWIN v. McCoy

292 N.E.2d 321, 31 N.Y.2d 887

New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 28, 1972·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

31 N.Y.2d 887 (1972)

In the Matter of Harold G. Baldwin et al., Appellants,
v.
Thomas F. McCoy, as State Administrator of the Administrative Board of the Judicial Conference of the State of New York, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted December 4, 1972. Decided December 28, 1972.

James D. Featherstonhaugh for appellants.

Lawrence N. Marcus for respondent.

Concur: Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL and JASEN. Taking no part: Chief Judge FULD and Judge GIBSON.

Order affirmed, without costs, on the opinion at the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

31 N.Y.2d 887 (1972)

In the Matter of Harold G. Baldwin et al., Appellants,
v.
Thomas F. McCoy, as State Administrator of the Administrative Board of the Judicial Conference of the State of New York, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted December 4, 1972. Decided December 28, 1972.

James D. Featherstonhaugh for appellants.

Lawrence N. Marcus for respondent.

Concur: Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL and JASEN. Taking no part: Chief Judge FULD and Judge GIBSON.

Order affirmed, without costs, on the opinion at the Appellate Division.

MATTER OF BALDWIN v. McCoy, 292 N.E.2d 321, 31 N.Y.2d 887 (N.Y. 1972).

Pincite

292 N.E.2d 321 (MATTER OF BALDWIN v. McCoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Koupash v. Bahou

85 A.D.2d 795 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Bier v. Sarafan

54 A.D.2d 1054 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)