MATTER OF BALDWIN v. McCoy
292 N.E.2d 321, 31 N.Y.2d 887
This text of 292 N.E.2d 321 (MATTER OF BALDWIN v. McCoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
MATTER OF BALDWIN v. McCoy, 292 N.E.2d 321, 31 N.Y.2d 887 (N.Y. 1972).
Opinion
In the Matter of Harold G. Baldwin et al., Appellants,
v.
Thomas F. McCoy, as State Administrator of the Administrative Board of the Judicial Conference of the State of New York, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
James D. Featherstonhaugh for appellants.
Lawrence N. Marcus for respondent.
Concur: Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL and JASEN. Taking no part: Chief Judge FULD and Judge GIBSON.
Order affirmed, without costs, on the opinion at the Appellate Division.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Koupash v. Bahou
85 A.D.2d 795 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Bier v. Sarafan
54 A.D.2d 1054 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
292 N.E.2d 321, 31 N.Y.2d 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-baldwin-v-mccoy-ny-1972.