Matter of Baldea v. City of New York License Div. of the NYPD

2021 NY Slip Op 03366, 144 N.Y.S.3d 567, 194 A.D.3d 634
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 27, 2021
DocketIndex No. 101128/19 Appeal No. 13933N Case No. 2020-01177
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 03366 (Matter of Baldea v. City of New York License Div. of the NYPD) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Baldea v. City of New York License Div. of the NYPD, 2021 NY Slip Op 03366, 144 N.Y.S.3d 567, 194 A.D.3d 634 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Matter of Baldea v City of New York License Div. of the NYPD (2021 NY Slip Op 03366)
Matter of Baldea v City of New York License Div. of the NYPD
2021 NY Slip Op 03366
Decided on May 27, 2021
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: May 27, 2021
Before: Kapnick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moulton, Mendez, JJ.

Index No. 101128/19 Appeal No. 13933N Case No. 2020-01177

[*1]In the Matter of Jimmy Baldea, American Resources & Strategies Inc., Petitioner-Appellant,

v

City of New York License Division of the NYPD, Respondent-Respondent.


Jimmy Baldea, appellant pro se.

James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, New York (Tahirih M. Sadrieh of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment (denominated an order), Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered November 27, 2019, denying the petition to annul the determination of respondent City of New York Police Department License Division, dated May 8, 2019, which denied petitioner's renewal application for an unrestricted business carry license, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly determined that the denial of petitioner's renewal application was not arbitrary and capricious. Respondent rationally concluded that petitioner's application did not establish "proper cause" within the meaning of Penal Law § 400.00,

in the absence of documentation substantiating threats to petitioner personally (see 38 RCNY 5-03; Matter of Martinek v Kerik , 294 AD2d 221, 221-222 [1st Dept 2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 613 [2002]).

We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and find them unavailing. THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: May 27, 2021



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Campisi v. Shea
2022 NY Slip Op 00938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 03366, 144 N.Y.S.3d 567, 194 A.D.3d 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-baldea-v-city-of-new-york-license-div-of-the-nypd-nyappdiv-2021.