Matter of Bailey v. Prack

125 A.D.3d 1028, 999 N.Y.S.2d 767
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 5, 2015
Docket519031
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 125 A.D.3d 1028 (Matter of Bailey v. Prack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Bailey v. Prack, 125 A.D.3d 1028, 999 N.Y.S.2d 767 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, an inmate, commenced this proceeding challenging a disciplinary determination finding him guilty of disobeying a direct order. The misbehavior report and testimony that petitioner “had words” with the correction officer when he was directed to remove his arm from around another inmate’s neck provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Harrington v Prack, 91 AD3d 1244, 1245 [2012]). It is well settled that petitioner, as a prison inmate, “was required to promptly obey the order even if he disagreed with it” (Matter of Wells v O’Keefe, 286 AD2d 791, 791 [2001]; see Matter of Tarbell v Prack, 89 AD3d 1342, 1343 [2011]). To *1029 the extent that petitioner claims that the misbehavior report was fabricated, this presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Suero v Fischer, 95 AD3d 1509, 1509-1510 [2012]).

Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Anselmo v. Annucci
2019 NY Slip Op 5252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Kirton v. Annucci
149 A.D.3d 1370 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Jamison v. Griffin
148 A.D.3d 1384 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Curry v. Annucci
148 A.D.3d 1395 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
POLANCO, WILFREDO v. ANNUCCI, ANTHONY
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
Polanco v. Annucci
136 A.D.3d 1325 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 A.D.3d 1028, 999 N.Y.S.2d 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-bailey-v-prack-nyappdiv-2015.