Matter of Bagdalik v. Flexlume Corp., State Ins. Fund

24 N.E.2d 499, 281 N.Y. 858, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1260
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 30, 1939·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Order reversed and claim dismissed, with costs in all courts. The employee’s work in Chicago makes applicable the rule laid down in Matter of Cameron v. Ellis Construction Co. (252 N. Y. 394). No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: O’Brien, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Bagdalik v. Flexlume Corp., State Ins. Fund, 24 N.E.2d 499, 281 N.Y. 858, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1260 (N.Y. 1939).

24 N.E.2d 499 (Matter of Bagdalik v. Flexlume Corp., State Ins. Fund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Rutledge v. Al. G. Kelly & Miller Bros. Circus
223 N.E.2d 334 (New York Court of Appeals, 1966)
Claim of Cradduck v. Hallen Co.
107 N.E.2d 61 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)
Claim of Baduski v. S. Gumpert Co.
277 A.D.2d 591 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Claim of Stephens v. Hudson Maintenance Co.
274 A.D. 1077 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
Claim of Bauss v. Consolidated Chimney Co.
270 A.D. 70 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)
Claim of Adams v. Max Solomon Co.
265 A.D. 427 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)