Matter of Bacon v. Huie

New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Bacon v. Huie

41 N.E.2d 93, 287 N.Y. 813, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1821

New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 5, 1942·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs. The petitioner was not entitled to be appointed to the position of Mechanical Engineer while the head of the department in the exercise of administrative discretion chose to leave the position vacant. He was not entitled to appointment to the position of Administrator of Public Buildings because the [Municipal] Civil Service Commission acted upon reasonable grounds in ordering a competitive examination for that position. No opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with costs. The petitioner was not entitled to be appointed to the position of Mechanical Engineer while the head of the department in the exercise of administrative discretion chose to leave the position vacant. He was not entitled to appointment to the position of Administrator of Public Buildings because the [Municipal] Civil Service Commission acted upon reasonable grounds in ordering a competitive examination for that position. No opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ.

Matter of Bacon v. Huie, 41 N.E.2d 93, 287 N.Y. 813, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1821 (N.Y. 1942).

Pincite

41 N.E.2d 93 (Matter of Bacon v. Huie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related