Matter of Austrolyn O. v. Michelle R.

135 A.D.3d 414, 21 N.Y.S.3d 878
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 5, 2016
Docket16532
StatusPublished

This text of 135 A.D.3d 414 (Matter of Austrolyn O. v. Michelle R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Austrolyn O. v. Michelle R., 135 A.D.3d 414, 21 N.Y.S.3d 878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

*415 Order, Family Court, New York County (Gloria Sosa-Lintner, J.), entered on or about February 23, 2015, which denied respondent mother’s motion to vacate an order granting custody of the subject child to petitioner paternal grandmother on consent of the parties, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Family Court properly denied respondent mother’s motion to vacate the custody order and to reopen the underlying custody proceeding. The record of the proceedings demonstrates that the mother’s decision to waive her right to counsel and proceed pro se was knowing and voluntary, and made after appropriate inquiries by the court (see Matter of James Joseph M. v Rosana R., 32 AD3d 725, 727 [1st Dept 2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 717 [2006]). Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe and Moskowitz, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James Joseph M. v. Rosana R.
32 A.D.3d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 A.D.3d 414, 21 N.Y.S.3d 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-austrolyn-o-v-michelle-r-nyappdiv-2016.