Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Wilson]

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Wilson]

132 A.D.3d 1144, 18 N.Y.S.3d 360, 18 N.Y.S.3d 565

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 22, 2015·No. D-66-15·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1992, was suspended by this Court’s order dated January 30, 2014 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (113 AD3d 1020 [2014]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

*1145 McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1992, was suspended by this Court’s order dated January 30, 2014 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (113 AD3d 1020 [2014]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

*1145 McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Wilson], 132 A.D.3d 1144, 18 N.Y.S.3d 360, 18 N.Y.S.3d 565 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

132 A.D.3d 1144 (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Wilson]) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related