Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law ? 468-a (Wang)
This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 07073 (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law ? 468-a (Wang)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Wang) |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 07073 |
| Decided on December 18, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Third Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered:December 18, 2025
PM-285-25
Calendar Date:November 24, 2025
Before:Clark, J.P., Pritzker, Lynch, Powers and Corcoran, JJ., concur.
Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.
Qingjie Wang, West Hartford, Connecticut, respondent pro se.
Motion by respondent for an order reinstating them to the practice of law following their suspension by October 2021 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 198 AD3d 1068, 1087 [3d Dept 2021]; see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).
Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibit sworn to October 10, 2025 and the November 20, 2025 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined that respondent has not demonstrated, by clear and convincing evidence, their compliance with the rules of this Court (see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16 [c] [5]), respondent's motion for reinstatement is denied.
ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is denied.
Clark, J.P., Pritzker, Lynch, Powers and Corcoran, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 NY Slip Op 07073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-attorneys-in-violation-of-judiciary-law-468-a-wang-nyappdiv-2025.