Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Tian)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Tian)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 9, 2026·No. PM-141-26·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Tian)

2026 NY Slip Op 04358

July 9, 2026

Appellate Division, Third Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; Lei Tian, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 4823316)

Decided and Entered:July 9, 2026

PM-141-26

Calendar Date: June 1, 2026

Before: Garry, P.J., Clark, Aarons, Fisher And Mcshan, JJ., Concur.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Lei Tian, Irvine, California, respondent pro se.

[*1]

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating them to the practice of law following their suspension by September 2022 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 208 AD3d 1421, 1443 [3d Dept 2022]; see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to April 25, 2026, respondent's supplemental correspondence dated May 29, 2026 and the May 27, 2026 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has satisfied the requirements of Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22 NYCRR) § 806.16 (c) (5), (2) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the rules of this Court, (3) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (4) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately.

Garry, P.J., Clark, Aarons, Fisher and McShan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Tian)

2026 NY Slip Op 04358

July 9, 2026

Appellate Division, Third Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; Lei Tian, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 4823316)

Decided and Entered:July 9, 2026

PM-141-26

Calendar Date: June 1, 2026

Before: Garry, P.J., Clark, Aarons, Fisher And Mcshan, JJ., Concur.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Lei Tian, Irvine, California, respondent pro se.

[*1]

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating them to the practice of law following their suspension by September 2022 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 208 AD3d 1421, 1443 [3d Dept 2022]; see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to April 25, 2026, respondent's supplemental correspondence dated May 29, 2026 and the May 27, 2026 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has satisfied the requirements of Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22 NYCRR) § 806.16 (c) (5), (2) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the rules of this Court, (3) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (4) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately.

Garry, P.J., Clark, Aarons, Fisher and McShan, JJ., concur.

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Tian), (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Pincite

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Tian) (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Tian)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.