Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Phillips]

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Phillips]

141 A.D.3d 825, 33 N.Y.S.3d 913

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 7, 2016·No. D-40-16·Published

Opinion

*826 Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1993, was suspended by this Court’s order dated June 15, 2000 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (273 AD2d 600 [2000]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*826 Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1993, was suspended by this Court’s order dated June 15, 2000 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (273 AD2d 600 [2000]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Phillips], 141 A.D.3d 825, 33 N.Y.S.3d 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

141 A.D.3d 825 (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Phillips]) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related