Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Patrie)

2023 NY Slip Op 04487

• Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
• Decided: September 7, 2023
• Docket: PM-205-23
• Status: Published

Opinion

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Patrie) (2023 NY Slip Op 04487)

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Patrie)

2023 NY Slip Op 04487

Decided on September 7, 2023

Appellate Division, Third Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered:September 7, 2023

PM-205-23

[*1]In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; Aparna Krishnaswamy Patrie, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 5380407.)

Calendar Date:July 31, 2023
Before:Garry, P.J., Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald, Fisher and McShan, JJ., concur.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Aparna Krishnaswamy Patrie, Lahaina, Hawaii, respondent pro se.

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating her to the practice of law following her suspension by September 2022 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 208 AD3d 1421, 1439 [3d Dept 2022]; see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit sworn to June 20, 2023 and the July 26, 2023 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately.

Garry, P.J., Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald, Fisher and McShan, JJ., concur.