Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Mohammed)

2020 NY Slip Op 667
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 30, 2020·No. PM-30-20·Published

Opinion

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Mohammed) (2020 NY Slip Op 00667)
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law 468-a (Mohammed)
2020 NY Slip Op 00667
Decided on January 30, 2020
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: January 30, 2020

PM-30-20

[*1]In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Heidi Sasha Mohammed, Also Known as Heidi Sasha Kirlew, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 5073267.)


Calendar Date: December 9, 2019
Before: Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Aarons, Pritzker and Colangelo, JJ., concur.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Heidi Sasha Mohammed, Hollywood, Florida, respondent

pro se.



Motion by respondent for an order reinstating her to the practice of law following her suspension by May 2019 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 172 AD3d 1706 [2019]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion, affidavit with exhibits sworn to October 17, 2019, supplemental affidavit with exhibit sworn to January 9, 2020, and the responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department dated December 6, 2019, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Stonner], 175 AD3d 799 [2019]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Dorsett], 174 AD3d 1219 [2019]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Aarons, Pritzker and Colangelo, JJ., concur.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Mohammed), 2020 NY Slip Op 667 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

2020 NY Slip Op 667 (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Mohammed)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431
§ 468
New York JUD § 468