Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Lee)
Opinion
It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Lee)
2026 NY Slip Op 04360
July 9, 2026
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; David Boksung Lee, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 5627922)
Decided and Entered:July 9, 2026
PM-143-26
Calendar Date: June 8, 2026
Before: Garry, P.J., Clark, Aarons, Fisher And Mcshan, JJ., Concur.
Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.
David Boksung Lee, Fairfax, Virginia, respondent pro se.
Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by September 2024 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 230 AD3d 1498, 1511 [3d Dept 2024]; see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).
Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit sworn to April 25, 2026, his supplemental affidavit with exhibits sworn to May 20, 2026 and the June 3, 2026 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]), it is
ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately.
Garry, P.J., Clark, Aarons, Fisher and McShan, JJ., concur.
Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Lee) (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Lee)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.