Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Kihumba-Watts)

2023 NY Slip Op 01732
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 30, 2023·No. PM-78-23·Published

Opinion

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Kihumba-Watts) (2023 NY Slip Op 01732)
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Kihumba-Watts)
2023 NY Slip Op 01732
Decided on March 30, 2023
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered:March 30, 2023

PM-78-23

[*1]In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; Susanne Wanjiru Kihumba-Watts, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 5377080.)


Calendar Date:January 9, 2023
Before:

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Susanne Wanjiru Kihumba-Watts, Kennesaw, Georgia, respondent pro se.



Motion by respondent for an order reinstating her to the practice of law following her suspension by September 2022 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 208 AD3d 1421, 1433 [3d Dept 2022]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16). Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to December 9, 2022, and the January 5, 2023 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Andison], 211 AD3d 1307, 1308 [3d Dept 2022]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately.

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Fisher, JJ., concur.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Kihumba-Watts), 2023 NY Slip Op 01732 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

2023 NY Slip Op 01732 (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Kihumba-Watts)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431
§ 468
New York JUD § 468