Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Kaniaru)
This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 9349 (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Kaniaru)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law 468-a (Kaniaru) |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 09349 |
| Decided on December 26, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, Third Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered: December 26, 2019
PM-237-19
Calendar Date: November 4, 2019
Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Mulvey, Devine and Pritzker, JJ., concur.
Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.
Muthoni Wacieni Kaniaru, Silver Spring, Maryland, respondent pro se.
Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by May 2019 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 172 AD3d 1706, 1731 [2019]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).
Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to September 19, 2019, the November 1, 2019 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department and respondent's supplemental submissions sworn to December 5, 2019, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Zerdan], 173 AD3d 1602, 1603 [2019]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Serbinowski], 164 AD3d 1049, 1051 [2018]), it is
ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.
Egan Jr., J.P., Mulvey, Devine and Pritzker, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 NY Slip Op 9349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-attorneys-in-violation-of-judiciary-law-468-a-kaniaru-nyappdiv-2019.