Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Jacque]

133 A.D.3d 1081, 19 N.Y.S.3d 443
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 2015·No. D-81-15·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Richard Robert Cornetta Jr., Respondent.

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

*1082 Garry, J.P., Lynch, Devine and. Clark, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Jacque], 133 A.D.3d 1081, 19 N.Y.S.3d 443 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

133 A.D.3d 1081 (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Jacque]) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Hills v. New York City Board of Education
133 A.D.3d 1079 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)