Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Egbuiwe)

2019 NY Slip Op 6144

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 6144 (Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Egbuiwe)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Egbuiwe), 2019 NY Slip Op 6144 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Egbuiwe) (2019 NY Slip Op 06144)
Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Egbuiwe)
2019 NY Slip Op 06144
Decided on August 15, 2019
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: August 15, 2019


[*1]In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-a. ROSE NONYEM EGBUIWE Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 4241303)


Calendar Date: August 5, 2019
Before: None

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Rose Nonyem Egbuiwe, Lynn, Massachusetts, respondent

pro se.



DECISION AND ORDER

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating her to the practice of law following her suspension by May 2019 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 172 AD3d 1706 [2019]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's affidavit with exhibit sworn to June 18, 2019, and upon reading the correspondence by the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department in response dated August 2, 2019, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Serbinowski], 164 AD3d 1049, 1050 [2018]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468—a [Squires], 153 AD3d 1511, 1513 [2017]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Mulvey, Devine and Aarons, JJ., concur.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (Timourian)
2017 NY Slip Op 6593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 6144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-attorneys-in-violation-of-judiciary-law-468-a-egbuiwe-nyappdiv-2019.