Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law ? 468-a (Bohl)
Opinion
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Bohl) (2025 NY Slip Op 06239)
| Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Bohl) |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 06239 |
| Decided on November 13, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Third Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered:November 13, 2025
PM-257-25
Calendar Date:October 20, 2025
Before:Pritzker, J.P., Reynolds Fitzgerald, Ceresia, Fisher and Powers, JJ., concur.
Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.
Nickolas Arlauckas Bohl, Redmond, Washington, respondent pro se.
Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by September 2022 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 208 AD3d 1421, 1425 [3d Dept 2022]; see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).
Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to September 15, 2025, the October 3, 2025 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC), respondent's supplemental affidavit with exhibit sworn to October 6, 2025 and the October 8, 2025 responsive correspondence from AGC, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has satisfied the requirements of Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22 NYCRR) § 806.16 (c) (5), (2) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the rules of this Court, (3) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (4) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]), it is
ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately.
Pritzker, J.P., Reynolds Fitzgerald, Ceresia, Fisher and Powers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2025 NY Slip Op 06239 (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law ? 468-a (Bohl)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.