Matter of Ashantewa W.L. (Doris L.)

2017 NY Slip Op 975, 147 A.D.3d 838, 46 N.Y.S.3d 431
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 8, 2017
Docket2015-05818
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 975 (Matter of Ashantewa W.L. (Doris L.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Ashantewa W.L. (Doris L.), 2017 NY Slip Op 975, 147 A.D.3d 838, 46 N.Y.S.3d 431 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Appeal by "the mother from an order of fact-finding of the Family Court, Westchester County (Kathie E. Davidson, J.), entered April 7, 2015. The order, after a fact-finding hearing, found that the mother neglected the subject child.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

To establish neglect of a child, the petitioner must demonstrate, by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]), that the child’s physical, mental, or emotional condition has been impaired or is in imminent danger of becoming impaired, and that actual or threatened harm to the child is a consequence of the failure of the parent or caretaker to exercise a minimum degree of care in providing the child with proper supervision or guardianship (see Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; Nicholson v Scoppetta, 3 NY3d 357, 368 [2004]). Here, the petitioner established, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the mother’s course of conduct impaired the subject child’s physical, mental, or emotional well-being, or placed her in imminent danger of such impairment (see Matter of Tyler C. [Andrea G.], 82 AD3d 1093, 1095 [2011]; Matter of Angelique L., 42 AD3d 569, 572 [2007]).

The mother’s contentions regarding a temporary order of removal issued pursuant to Family Court Act § 1022 are not properly before this Court (see Matter of Jamakie B. [Gwendolyn J.], 119 AD3d 939, 940 [2014]).

The mother’s remaining contention is without merit.

Lev-enthal, J.R, Sgroi, LaSalle and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nicholson v. Scoppetta
820 N.E.2d 840 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
Matter of Jamakie B. (Gwendolyn J.)
119 A.D.3d 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
In re Angelique L.
42 A.D.3d 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re Tyler C.
82 A.D.3d 1093 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 975, 147 A.D.3d 838, 46 N.Y.S.3d 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-ashantewa-wl-doris-l-nyappdiv-2017.