Matter of Arianna C. W. (Reginald M.)

2019 NY Slip Op 5409
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 3, 2019
DocketDocket No. B-05692-17
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 5409 (Matter of Arianna C. W. (Reginald M.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Arianna C. W. (Reginald M.), 2019 NY Slip Op 5409 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Matter of Arianna C. W. (Reginald M.) (2019 NY Slip Op 05409)
Matter of Arianna C. W. (Reginald M.)
2019 NY Slip Op 05409
Decided on July 3, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 3, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
MARK C. DILLON
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2018-13231
(Docket No. B-05692-17)

[*1]In the Matter of Arianna C. W. (Anonymous). SCO Family of Services, petitioner-respondent; Reginald M. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent.


Larry Bachner, New York, NY, for appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Dawne A. Mitchell and Judith Stern), attorney for the child.



DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the putative father appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Robert Caloras, J.), dated October 5, 2018. The order, inter alia, terminated his parental rights and transferred guardianship and custody of the subject child to the petitioner for the purpose of adoption. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which he moves to be relieved of his assignment to prosecute this appeal.

ORDERED that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Whittaker v Quiles, 144 AD3d 931; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252).

MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Matter of Whittaker v. Quiles
2016 NY Slip Op 7664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
In re Giovanni S.
89 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 5409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-arianna-c-w-reginald-m-nyappdiv-2019.