Matter of Argueta (Commr. of Labor)

133 A.D.3d 1005, 18 N.Y.S.3d 891
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 12, 2015
Docket520527
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 133 A.D.3d 1005 (Matter of Argueta (Commr. of Labor)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Argueta (Commr. of Labor), 133 A.D.3d 1005, 18 N.Y.S.3d 891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 18, 2014, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from his employment as a store detective in the loss prevention department of a retail clothing store for taking unauthorized breaks and sleeping during his shift. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he lost his employment due to disqualifying misconduct. Contrary to claimant’s contention, the testimony at the hearing and the inferences to be drawn from the videotape evidence provide substantial evidence to support the Board’s finding that claimant slept during his shift, which claimant was aware violated the employer’s established policy (see Matter of Beydoun [Trump World Tower Condominium— Commissioner of Labor], 308 AD2d 625, 625 [2003]; Matter of De Maria [Commissioner of Labor], 276 AD2d 1010, 1010-1011 [2000]). Although claimant denied that he was sleeping, this presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see Matter of Sanders [Rescue Mission Alliance Inc. —Commissioner of Labor], 106 AD3d 1311, 1312 [2013]; Matter of Jordan [Moschitto Trim & Jewelry Corp. —Commissioner of Labor], 296 AD2d 734, 734-735 [2002]). Claimant’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be unpersuasive.

Garry, J.R, Rose, Devine and Clark, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Arocho (Commissioner of Labor)
2019 NY Slip Op 1880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Gallman (Commr. of Labor)
138 A.D.3d 1296 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 A.D.3d 1005, 18 N.Y.S.3d 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-argueta-commr-of-labor-nyappdiv-2015.