Matter of Aramas v. Venettozzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Aramas v. Venettozzi

2017 NY Slip Op 7659, 155 A.D.3d 1148, 62 N.Y.S.3d 835

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 2, 2017·No. 524277·Published

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding chai-lenging a tier III determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules as charged in two misbehavior reports. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto expunged from petitioner’s administrative record and the $5 mandatory surcharge will be refunded to his inmate account. As petitioner has accordingly received all the relief to which he is entitled, this proceeding is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Serrano v Smith, 152 AD3d 854, 854 [2017]).

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Lynch, Rose and Mulvey, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding chai-lenging a tier III determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules as charged in two misbehavior reports. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto expunged from petitioner’s administrative record and the $5 mandatory surcharge will be refunded to his inmate account. As petitioner has accordingly received all the relief to which he is entitled, this proceeding is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Serrano v Smith, 152 AD3d 854, 854 [2017]).

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Lynch, Rose and Mulvey, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $15.

Matter of Aramas v. Venettozzi, 2017 NY Slip Op 7659, 155 A.D.3d 1148, 62 N.Y.S.3d 835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

2017 NY Slip Op 7659 (Matter of Aramas v. Venettozzi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related