Matter of Application of Worthington
132 P. 82, 21 Cal. App. 497, 1913 Cal. App. LEXIS 285
Opinion
It appearing to the court that the act which petitioner is charged with having violated is one entitled, an act governing the use of automobiles upon public highways, and it not being averred in the complaint that the defendant used or operated his automobile upon a public highway, the complaint failed to state any public offense, and for that reason it is ordered that petitioner be discharged, and that the money deposited in lieu of bail be returned. *Page 498
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Application of Worthington, 132 P. 82, 21 Cal. App. 497, 1913 Cal. App. LEXIS 285 (Cal. Ct. App. 1913).
132 P. 82 (Matter of Application of Worthington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Stansberry
242 Cal. App. 2d 199 (California Court of Appeal, 1966)
People v. Knight
96 P.2d 173 (California Court of Appeal, 1939)
People v. Stanley
57 P.2d 146 (California Court of Appeal, 1936)
People v. Hoenschle
22 P.2d 777 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)
State Ex Rel. Callahan v. Second Judicial District Court
18 P.2d 449 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1933)
In Re Hernandez
220 P. 423 (California Court of Appeal, 1923)
Dorris v. McKamy
180 P. 645 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)