Matter of Antwine v. Evans

192 N.Y.S.3d 267, 219 A.D.3d 480, 2023 NY Slip Op 04118
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 2, 2023
Docket2023-04631
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 192 N.Y.S.3d 267 (Matter of Antwine v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Antwine v. Evans, 192 N.Y.S.3d 267, 219 A.D.3d 480, 2023 NY Slip Op 04118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Matter of Antwine v Evans (2023 NY Slip Op 04118)
Matter of Antwine v Evans
2023 NY Slip Op 04118
Decided on August 2, 2023
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on August 2, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, J.P.
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
HELEN VOUTSINAS
JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.

2023-04631

[*1]In the Matter of Sherri Antwine, etc., petitioner,

v

Lance Evans, etc., et al., respondents.


Biolsi Law Group, P.C., New York, NY (Steven Alexander Biolsi of counsel), for petitioner.

Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (Elizabeth A. Figueira of counsel), for respondent Lance Evans.



DECISION & JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Lance Evans, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, to sign an order to show cause in an action entitled Wilmington Trust, National Association v Rice , pending in that court under Index No. 709829/14.

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman , 53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

IANNACCI, J.P., MALTESE, VOUTSINAS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Griffin v. Westchester County
2024 NY Slip Op 04202 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 N.Y.S.3d 267, 219 A.D.3d 480, 2023 NY Slip Op 04118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-antwine-v-evans-nyappdiv-2023.