Matter of Anthony W. (Antoinette K.--Anthony W.)

2021 NY Slip Op 07360, 200 A.D.3d 1596, 155 N.Y.S.3d 844
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 23, 2021
Docket773 CAF 20-00429
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 07360 (Matter of Anthony W. (Antoinette K.--Anthony W.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Anthony W. (Antoinette K.--Anthony W.), 2021 NY Slip Op 07360, 200 A.D.3d 1596, 155 N.Y.S.3d 844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Matter of Anthony W. (Antoinette K.--Anthony W.) (2021 NY Slip Op 07360)
Matter of Anthony W. (Antoinette K.--Anthony W.)
2021 NY Slip Op 07360
Decided on December 23, 2021
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 23, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

773 CAF 20-00429

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY W. ONONDAGA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; ANTOINETTE K., RESPONDENT, AND ANTHONY W., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.


FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (TYLER BUGDEN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

ROBERT A. DURR, COUNTY ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JOSEPH M. MARZOCCHI OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

CATHERINE M. SULLIVAN, OSWEGO, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.



Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (Michael L. Hanuszczak, J.), entered February 10, 2020 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order denied the motion of respondent Anthony W. to dismiss the petition.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, respondent father appeals from an order that denied his motion to dismiss the petition against him. After entry of that order, Family Court entered an order of fact-finding and disposition from which respondent has not appealed. The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the order of disposition (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]; Matter of Brittany C. [Linda C.], 67 AD3d 788, 789 [2d Dept 2009], lv denied 14 NY3d 702 [2010]; see generally Matter of Heavenly A. [Michael P.], 173 AD3d 1621, 1622 [4th Dept 2019]).

Entered: December 23, 2021

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Silas W.
207 A.D.3d 1234 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 07360, 200 A.D.3d 1596, 155 N.Y.S.3d 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-anthony-w-antoinette-k-anthony-w-nyappdiv-2021.