Matter of Angelina M. (Joaquin C.--Teresa Nicole B.)

135 A.D.3d 651, 24 N.Y.S.3d 603
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 28, 2016
Docket53
StatusPublished

This text of 135 A.D.3d 651 (Matter of Angelina M. (Joaquin C.--Teresa Nicole B.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Angelina M. (Joaquin C.--Teresa Nicole B.), 135 A.D.3d 651, 24 N.Y.S.3d 603 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Order of fact-finding and disposition (one paper), Family Court, New York County (Jane Pearl, J.), entered on or about January 6, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, determined that appellant, who was a person legally responsible for the care of two of the subject children and was the father of the third, neglected them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly found that petitioner satisfied its burden *652 of demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that appellant neglected the subject children based on his admissions that he punched one of the children in the face to extract a loose tooth and was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder and depression, and the testimony of the caseworker concerning statements by the older children that he choked the mother in front of them, threatened to kill the mother, the children, and the caseworker, and choked one of the children (see Nicholson v Scoppetta, 3 NY3d 357, 368-369 [2004]).

The children’s out-of-court statements were admissible because they were cross corroborated and supported by appellant’s admissions and the bruises on the mother and two of the children that were observed by different police officers (see Matter of Nicole V., 71 NY2d 112, 118 [1987]; Matter of Jadaquis B. [Sameerah B.], 116 AD3d 448, 449 [1st Dept 2014]).

The evidence presented as to appellant’s conduct with respect to the mother and the older children was sufficient to support a finding of neglect as to the youngest child (see Matter of Nhyashanti A. [Evelyn B.], 102 AD3d 470 [1st Dept 2013]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nicholson v. Scoppetta
820 N.E.2d 840 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
In re Nicole V.
518 N.E.2d 914 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 A.D.3d 651, 24 N.Y.S.3d 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-angelina-m-joaquin-c-teresa-nicole-b-nyappdiv-2016.