MATTER OF AMORELLI v. Berman

New York Court of Appeals

MATTER OF AMORELLI v. Berman

228 N.E.2d 412, 19 N.Y.2d 960

DecidedMay 31, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 228 N.E.2d 412 (MATTER OF AMORELLI v. Berman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MATTER OF AMORELLI v. Berman, 228 N.E.2d 412, 19 N.Y.2d 960 (N.Y. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

19 N.Y.2d 960 (1967)

In the Matter of Francis P. Amorelli et al., Respondents,
v.
Frederic S. Berman, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Appellant, and Judith Chirgwin, Intervenor-Appellant.
In the Matter of George Palazzo et al., Respondents,
v.
Frederic S. Berman, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Appellant, and Liane Richards, Intervenor-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued May 17, 1967. Decided May 31, 1967.

Eugene P. Bambrick and Maurice A. Reichman for appellant.

John L. Romeo for Francis P. Amorelli and another, respondents.

Anthony F. Vietri for George Palazzo and another, respondents.

Martin Markson and Louis Waldman for intervenors-appellants.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING and BREITEL.

In each proceeding: Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI