MATTER OF AMMIRATA v. Weidy
268 N.E.2d 324, 28 N.Y.2d 564
This text of 268 N.E.2d 324 (MATTER OF AMMIRATA v. Weidy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
MATTER OF AMMIRATA v. Weidy, 268 N.E.2d 324, 28 N.Y.2d 564 (N.Y. 1971).
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of Amedeo Ammirata, Respondent,
v.
Harry Weidy et al., Respondents, and Special Fund for Reopened Cases, Appellant. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
John M. Cullen for appellant.
Anne G. Kafka for respondents.
Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON. Taking no part: Judge BURKE.
Order affirmed, with costs, to respondents employer and carrier; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Claim of Gregorec v. Brenners Furniture Co.
68 A.D.3d 1301 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Claim of Hantz v. Brightman Agency
29 A.D.3d 1098 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Claim of Jones v. HSBC
304 A.D.2d 864 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Claim of Martin v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.
54 A.D.2d 1002 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
268 N.E.2d 324, 28 N.Y.2d 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-ammirata-v-weidy-ny-1971.