MATTER OF AMMIRATA v. Weidy

268 N.E.2d 324, 28 N.Y.2d 564

New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 21, 1971·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

28 N.Y.2d 564 (1971)

In the Matter of the Claim of Amedeo Ammirata, Respondent,
v.
Harry Weidy et al., Respondents, and Special Fund for Reopened Cases, Appellant. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued January 7, 1971. Decided January 21, 1971.

John M. Cullen for appellant.

Anne G. Kafka for respondents.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON. Taking no part: Judge BURKE.

Order affirmed, with costs, to respondents employer and carrier; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

28 N.Y.2d 564 (1971)

In the Matter of the Claim of Amedeo Ammirata, Respondent,
v.
Harry Weidy et al., Respondents, and Special Fund for Reopened Cases, Appellant. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued January 7, 1971. Decided January 21, 1971.

John M. Cullen for appellant.

Anne G. Kafka for respondents.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON. Taking no part: Judge BURKE.

Order affirmed, with costs, to respondents employer and carrier; no opinion.

MATTER OF AMMIRATA v. Weidy, 268 N.E.2d 324, 28 N.Y.2d 564 (N.Y. 1971).

Pincite

268 N.E.2d 324 (MATTER OF AMMIRATA v. Weidy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Gregorec v. Brenners Furniture Co.

68 A.D.3d 1301 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Claim of Hantz v. Brightman Agency

29 A.D.3d 1098 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Claim of Jones v. HSBC

304 A.D.2d 864 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Claim of Martin v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.

54 A.D.2d 1002 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)