Matter of Aminata S. v. Ndongo D.

2024 NY Slip Op 04628
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 26, 2024
DocketDocket No. V01882/23 V01883/23 Appeal No. 2608 Case No. 2023-06816
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 04628 (Matter of Aminata S. v. Ndongo D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Aminata S. v. Ndongo D., 2024 NY Slip Op 04628 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Matter of Aminata S. v Ndongo D. (2024 NY Slip Op 04628)
Matter of Aminata S. v Ndongo D.
2024 NY Slip Op 04628
Decided on September 26, 2024
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: September 26, 2024
Before: Webber, J.P., Kern, Oing, González, Rosado, JJ.

Docket No. V01882/23 V01883/23 Appeal No. 2608 Case No. 2023-06816

[*1]In the Matter of Aminata S., Petitioner-Respondent,

v

Ndongo D., Respondent-Appellant.


Daniel X. Robinson, New York, for appellant.

Larry Bachner, New York, for respondent.

Janet Neustaetter, The Childrens Law Center, Brooklyn (Rachel J. Stanton of counsel), attorney for the children.



Appeal from order, Family Court, Bronx County (Jaclyn P. Sherman, Referee), entered on or about December 12, 2023, which, after a fact-finding hearing and upon respondent father's default, granted petitioner aunt's petition for custody of the subject children, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

Upon our review of respondent father's assigned counsel's motion and the record, we agree that the subject order is nonappealable since it was entered following the father's default at the fact-finding hearing, and the father did not move to vacate his default (see Matter of Neil F. J. v Maria I. M., 208 AD3d 1101 [1st Dept 2022]; CPLR 5511).

Application by the father's assigned counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). The record indicates that there are no nonfrivolous issues that could be raised on appeal.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: September 26, 2024



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Saunders
52 A.D.2d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 04628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-aminata-s-v-ndongo-d-nyappdiv-2024.