Matter of Allyerra E. (Alando E.)

132 A.D.3d 472, 17 N.Y.S.3d 634
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 13, 2015
Docket15872
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 132 A.D.3d 472 (Matter of Allyerra E. (Alando E.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Allyerra E. (Alando E.), 132 A.D.3d 472, 17 N.Y.S.3d 634 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Order of fact-finding and disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Carol R. Sherman, J.), entered on or about October 2, 2014, which to the extent appealed as limited by the briefs, determined, after a hearing, that respondent father had neglected the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 1012 [¶] [i] [B]). The child’s out-of-court statements, regarding respondent’s use of violence against the mother, were corroborated by the testimony of the mother and the agency caseworker, and the mother’s medical records (Matter of Carmine G. [Franklin G.], 115 AD3d 594, 594 [1st Dept 2014]; Matter of Madison M. [Nathan M.], 123 AD3d 616, 617 [1st Dept 2014]).

*473 Respondent’s argument that, since the alleged domestic violence was an isolated incident, the Family Court’s finding of neglect was not based on a preponderance of the evidence, is unavailing, inasmuch as a single incident where the parent’s judgment was strongly impaired and the child was exposed to a risk of substantial harm can sustain a finding of neglect (Madison M., 123 AD3d at 616; Matter of Kayla W., 47 AD3d 571, 572 [1st Dept 2008]). The Family Court properly discredited respondent’s testimony that he does not have a history of violence against the mother, given that respondent admitted to pushing the mother on the date of the incident, and that there was an order of protection against him based on a subsequent incident (see e.g. Matter of Aaron C. [Grace C.], 105 AD3d 548 [1st Dept 2013]).

Concur — Tom, J.R, Acosta, Richter and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Amelia A. (Saul A.)
2024 NY Slip Op 00018 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Matter of Rebecca v. (Diomedes v.
2020 NY Slip Op 825 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Kimora D. (Joseph C.--Ojetta T.D.)
2019 NY Slip Op 7851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Chandler A. (Carlton A.)
2019 NY Slip Op 529 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Adam C. (Charles R.)
2018 NY Slip Op 8559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Cristalyn G. (Elvis S.)
2018 NY Slip Op 1254 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Macin D. (Miguel D.)
2017 NY Slip Op 2143 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Genesis R. (Marcelino C.)
2016 NY Slip Op 8955 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 A.D.3d 472, 17 N.Y.S.3d 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-allyerra-e-alando-e-nyappdiv-2015.