Matter of Alejandro F.C. v. Alexis O.

2020 NY Slip Op 3737, 185 A.D.3d 424, 124 N.Y.S.3d 785
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 2, 2020
Docket11751 -27377/16 -7551/17
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 3737 (Matter of Alejandro F.C. v. Alexis O.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Alejandro F.C. v. Alexis O., 2020 NY Slip Op 3737, 185 A.D.3d 424, 124 N.Y.S.3d 785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Matter of Alejandro F.C. v Alexis O. (2020 NY Slip Op 03737)
Matter of Alejandro F.C. v Alexis O.
2020 NY Slip Op 03737
Decided on July 2, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 2, 2020
Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Gische, Kern, Oing, González, JJ.

11751 -27377/16 -7551/17

[*1] In re Alejandro F.C., Petitioner-Respondent,

v

Alexis O., Respondent-Appellant.


Geoffrey P. Berman, Larchmont, for appellant.

Andrew J. Baer, New York, for respondent.

Janet Neustaetter, The Children's Law Center, Brooklyn (Chai Park of counsel), attorney for the child.



Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Karen M.C. Cortes, J.), entered on or about June 17, 2019, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, after a hearing, awarded petitioner father primary physical custody of the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The award of primary physical custody of the child to petitioner father has a sound and substantial basis in the record. The court properly considered the totality of the circumstances and concluded that the best interests of the child would be served if he resided primarily with petitioner (see Eschbach v Eschbach , 56 NY2d 167, 171, l72-173 [1982]; Domestic Relations Law § 70). The record shows that the child had lived primarily with petitioner since he was three years old and that petitioner was better able than respondent mother to provide a stable environment for him and to attend to his emotional, educational, and medical needs.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JULY 2, 2020

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Jose R. v. Diomara L.
2021 NY Slip Op 06062 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 3737, 185 A.D.3d 424, 124 N.Y.S.3d 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-alejandro-fc-v-alexis-o-nyappdiv-2020.