Matter of Albert C. v. Gross
Opinion
The CPLR article 78 application seeking relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus is denied and the proceeding dismissed, without costs.
Pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 10.07 (a), a trial shall be commenced within 60 days of the court’s probable cause determination. However, this deadline is not strictly construed (Matter of State of New York v Keith F, 149 AD3d 671 [1st Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 917 [2017]). The State’s failure to comply with the deadline does not affect the validity of the article 10 petition or actions subject to deadlines (id.; see also Matter of Grossman v Rankin, 43 NY2d 493, 501 [1977]). The 32-day delay of trial did not otherwise violate petitioner’s due process rights where it was done to accommodate a family medical emergency of a crucial expert witness.
Accordingly we deny a writ of mandamus compelling the respondent to restore the jury trial.
Justice Michael A. Gross has elected, pursuant to CPLR 7804 (i), not to appear in this proceeding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2017 NY Slip Op 8479 (Matter of Albert C. v. Gross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.