MATTER OF ALBANY CALCIUM LIGHT CO., INC. v. State Tax Comm'n

380 N.E.2d 165, 44 N.Y.2d 986, 44 N.Y. 986, 408 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2166
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 6, 1978
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 380 N.E.2d 165 (MATTER OF ALBANY CALCIUM LIGHT CO., INC. v. State Tax Comm'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF ALBANY CALCIUM LIGHT CO., INC. v. State Tax Comm'n, 380 N.E.2d 165, 44 N.Y.2d 986, 44 N.Y. 986, 408 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2166 (N.Y. 1978).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

On this appeal by the State Tax Commission the only question before us is whether the cylinders, which the petitioner uses to deliver gas to its customers, were purchased for resale so as to be exempt from the sales tax at the time of purchase (Tax Law, § 1105, subd [a]; § 1101, subd [b], par [4]).

Initially we note that the statute defines a sale (Tax Law, § 1101, subd [b], par [5]) and does not separately define a resale. It appears then that the Legislature does not consider a sale and resale as discrete concepts and thus a purchaser who acquires an item for the purpose of sale or rental (Tax Law, § 1101, subd [b], par [5]) purchases it for resale within the meaning of the statute. We also recognize that a company which furnishes gas to its customers in cylinders must, if it is to remain solvent, include and recover the cost of the cylinder in the rate charged for the gas. It does not follow, however, that when the gas is delivered in the cylinder the customer is renting the cylinder absent a specified charge for that rental. *988 It should not fall within judicial "decisional analysis” to determine what is or is not a rental (cf. Matter of Crossman Cadillac v Board of Assessors, 44 NY2d 964, decided herewith).

Demurrage charges for retaining the cylinder beyond the initial 30-day period are, on the other hand, rental fees which are not included in the customers’ cost of purchasing the gas. However, the fact that the petitioner charges such a fee does not mean that the cylinders were purchased for the purpose of rental. Obviously the petitioner did not acquire the cylinders with the expectation of collecting these unusual charges which are purely incidental to its primary business of selling gas to its customers.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order reversed, with costs, and the determination of the State Tax Commission that petitioner’s original acquisition of metallic cylinders was not tax exempt reinstated in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Washington Sq. Hotel LLC v. Tax Appeals Trib. of The State of New York
2017 NY Slip Op 8422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Shuai Yin v. State of N.Y. Dept. of Taxation & Fin.
2017 NY Slip Op 5285 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
EchoStar Satellite Corp. v. Tax Appeals Tribunal
982 N.E.2d 1248 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)
EchoStar Satellite Corp. v. Tax Appeals Tribunal
79 A.D.3d 1307 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Ianniello v. New York Tax Appeals Tribunal
209 A.D.2d 740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Waste Management of New York, Inc. v. Tax Appeals Tribunal
185 A.D.2d 479 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Atlas Linen Supply Co. v. Chu
149 A.D.2d 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Custom Management Corp. v. New York State Tax Commission
148 A.D.2d 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Levine v. State Tax Commission
144 A.D.2d 209 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Midland Asphalt Corp. v. Chu
136 A.D.2d 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Greene & Kellogg, Inc. v. Chu
134 A.D.2d 755 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Valley Welding Supply Co. v. Chu
131 A.D.2d 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Bloomingdale Bros v. Chu
119 A.D.2d 41 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Food Concepts, Inc. v. State Tax Commission
122 A.D.2d 371 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Niagara Lubricant Co. v. State Tax Commission
120 A.D.2d 885 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Darien Lake Fun Country, Inc. v. State Tax Commission
118 A.D.2d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Matter of U-Need-A-Roll Off Corp. v. New York State Tax Comm'n
490 N.E.2d 840 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
U-Need-a-Roll Off Corp. v. New York State Tax Commission
111 A.D.2d 457 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Micheli Contracting Corp. v. New York State Tax Commission
109 A.D.2d 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Sunny Vending Co. v. State Tax Commission
101 A.D.2d 666 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
380 N.E.2d 165, 44 N.Y.2d 986, 44 N.Y. 986, 408 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-albany-calcium-light-co-inc-v-state-tax-commn-ny-1978.