Matter of Aissatou D. v. Mamadou D.

137 A.D.3d 599, 26 N.Y.S.3d 700

This text of 137 A.D.3d 599 (Matter of Aissatou D. v. Mamadou D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Aissatou D. v. Mamadou D., 137 A.D.3d 599, 26 N.Y.S.3d 700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County (Fiordaliza A. Rodriguez, Special Ref.), entered on or about February 10, 2015, which, after a fact-finding hearing, dismissed petitioner mother’s family offense petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Family Court’s determination that the mother failed to establish, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, that respondent father had committed acts warranting an order of protection, has a sound and substantial basis in the record (Matter of *600 Everett C. v Oneida P., 61 AD3d 489, 489 [1st Dept 2009]; Family Ct Act § 812 [1]; Penal Law §§ 240.26 [3]; 240.30 [2]). Family Court’s finding that the father’s testimony was more credible than the mother’s is entitled to great deference, and will not be disturbed on appeal (61 AD3d at 489). We have considered the mother’s argument that she is entitled to a de novo review, and find it unavailing.

Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Everett C. v. Oneida P.
61 A.D.3d 489 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 A.D.3d 599, 26 N.Y.S.3d 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-aissatou-d-v-mamadou-d-nyappdiv-2016.