Matter of A.H. Du Grenier, Inc. v. McGoldrick

22 N.E.2d 764, 281 N.Y. 669, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1118
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 27, 1939·Published

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied and motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding after the words “ be and the same hereby is affirmed, with costs,” the words “ upon the sole ground that the City Sales Tax Law as here applied violates the Commerce Clause (Art. 1, sec. 8, cl. 3) of the Constitution of the United States.” (See 281 N. Y. 608.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of A.H. Du Grenier, Inc. v. McGoldrick, 22 N.E.2d 764, 281 N.Y. 669, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1118 (N.Y. 1939).

22 N.E.2d 764 (Matter of A.H. Du Grenier, Inc. v. McGoldrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of A.H. Dugrenier, Inc. v. McGoldrick
22 N.E.2d 172 (New York Court of Appeals, 1939)