MATTER OF AGOGLIA v. Glass

New York Court of Appeals

MATTER OF AGOGLIA v. Glass

272 N.E.2d 578, 29 N.Y.2d 535

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 10, 1971

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 272 N.E.2d 578 (MATTER OF AGOGLIA v. Glass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MATTER OF AGOGLIA v. Glass, 272 N.E.2d 578, 29 N.Y.2d 535 (N.Y. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

29 N.Y.2d 535 (1971)

In the Matter of Loretta M. Agoglia, Appellant,
v.
M. Milton Glass et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, Respondents, and Mary Goldstein, Intervenor-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued May 24, 1971. Decided June 10, 1971.

John F. Fitzsimons for appellant.

J. Lee Rankin, Corporation Counsel (Leonard Koerner, Stanley Buchsbaum and Owen Zurhellen, III of counsel), for Board of Standards and Appeals, respondent.

Reginald S. Hardy and Lawrence W. Boes for Mary Goldstein, intervenor-respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

29 N.Y.2d 535 (1971)

In the Matter of Loretta M. Agoglia, Appellant,
v.
M. Milton Glass et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, Respondents, and Mary Goldstein, Intervenor-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued May 24, 1971. Decided June 10, 1971.

John F. Fitzsimons for appellant.

J. Lee Rankin, Corporation Counsel (Leonard Koerner, Stanley Buchsbaum and Owen Zurhellen, III of counsel), for Board of Standards and Appeals, respondent.

Reginald S. Hardy and Lawrence W. Boes for Mary Goldstein, intervenor-respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 N.E.2d 578, 29 N.Y.2d 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-agoglia-v-glass-ny-1971.

Opinion

In the Matter of Loretta M. Agoglia, Appellant, v. M. Milton Glass et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, Respondents, and Mary Goldstein, Intervenor-Respondent.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

In the Matter of Loretta M. Agoglia, Appellant,
v.
M. Milton Glass et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, Respondents, and Mary Goldstein, Intervenor-Respondent.