Matter of Aetna Inc. v. New York City Tax Appeals Trib.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Aetna Inc. v. New York City Tax Appeals Trib.

2017 NY Slip Op 7311, 154 A.D.3d 542, 61 N.Y.S.3d 885

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 19, 2017

Docket70/16 -4533] 4725

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 7311 (Matter of Aetna Inc. v. New York City Tax Appeals Trib.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Aetna Inc. v. New York City Tax Appeals Trib., 2017 NY Slip Op 7311, 154 A.D.3d 542, 61 N.Y.S.3d 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Decision of respondent New York City Tax Appeals Tribunal, dated June 3, 2016, which reinstated Notices of Disallowance for petitioner’s New York City General Corporation Tax (GCT) returns for the calendar years 2005 and 2006, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding, commenced in this Court pursuant to CPLR 506 (b) (4) and article 78, dismissed, without costs.

The Tribunal’s decision that under the relevant statutory scheme, petitioner’s subsidiary health maintenance organizations were subject to the GCT during the period in issue is rational and supported by substantial evidence, and is thus entitled to deference (see Matter of National Bulk Carriers Inc. & Affiliates v New York City Tax Appeals Trib., 61 AD3d 522 [1st Dept 2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 716 [2009]).

Concur— Acosta, P.J., Friedman, Webber, Oing and Moulton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decision of respondent New York City Tax Appeals Tribunal, dated June 3, 2016, which reinstated Notices of Disallowance for petitioner’s New York City General Corporation Tax (GCT) returns for the calendar years 2005 and 2006, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding, commenced in this Court pursuant to CPLR 506 (b) (4) and article 78, dismissed, without costs.

The Tribunal’s decision that under the relevant statutory scheme, petitioner’s subsidiary health maintenance organizations were subject to the GCT during the period in issue is rational and supported by substantial evidence, and is thus entitled to deference (see Matter of National Bulk Carriers Inc. & Affiliates v New York City Tax Appeals Trib., 61 AD3d 522 [1st Dept 2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 716 [2009]).

Concur— Acosta, P.J., Friedman, Webber, Oing and Moulton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 7311, 154 A.D.3d 542, 61 N.Y.S.3d 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-aetna-inc-v-new-york-city-tax-appeals-trib-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack