Matter of AES v. Diamond
This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 2666 (Matter of AES v. Diamond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Matter of AES v Diamond |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 02666 |
| Decided on April 9, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on April 9, 2019
Renwick, J.P., Richter, Tom, Kahn, Moulton, JJ.
8949 165/18 [5721 -351 -6520 -6521 -33 -472 -709
v
Arthur M. Diamond, etc., Respondents.
Jeffrey L. Solomon, PLLC, Jericho (Jeffrey L. Solomon of counsel), for petitioners.
Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Monica Schwartz Hanna of counsel), for Hon. Arthur M. Diamond, Hon. Hope S. Zimmerman, Hon. Thomas Adams, Hon. Randy Sue Marber, Hon. Alan D. Scheinkman and Hon. Harriet Weinberger, respondents.
Wand & Goody, LLP, Huntington (Jennifer H. Goody of counsel), for Mark B. Lew, respondent.
Beth Ross, respondent pro se.
G. S., respondent pro se.
The above-named petitioners having presented a petition in the Second Department, transferred to this Court by order dated November 14, 2018, praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the petition hereby is denied and the motions to dismiss the petition (M-361; M-351) are granted to the extent of dismissing the petition. Since petitioners failed to meet their burden of demonstrating a "clear legal right" to the relief sought, neither mandamus nor prohibition is available (see Matter of Holtzman v Goldman , 71 NY2d 564 [1988]; Matter of Rush v Mordue , 68 NY2d 348 [1986]).
M-6520 Motion to stay proceedings denied.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: APRIL 9, 2019
CLERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 NY Slip Op 2666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-aes-v-diamond-nyappdiv-2019.